CFD-FVM-07: The Finite Volume Method for Convection-diffusion Problems

YiQi 管理员

Introduction

The steady convection–diffusion equation

Formal integration over a control volume gives

Steady one-dimensional convection and diffusion

We consider

satisfying the continuity equation

Consider the grid of

Then we have

It is convenient to define two variables and to represent the convective mass flux per unit area and diffusion conductance at cell faces

Using the central differencing we have


We also assume that the velocity field is ‘somehow known’.

The central differencing scheme

Let’s try the central scheme to compute the cell face values for the convective terms

Rearranging the terms we have

Further rearranging the terms we have

Writing to the form of with

Example 1

A property is transported by means of convection and diffusion through the one-dimensional domain.

  • case 1:
  • case 2:
  • case 3: with 20 grid nodes.

Analytical solution:

For node 2, node 3 and node 4 we use the above conclusion. For node 1 we have

For node 5 we have

Note that and . The general form can be written as

with
with

Node
1 0
2, 3, 4 0 0
5 0

Case 1

Case 2

These oscillations are often called ‘wiggles’ in the literature

Case 3

It has reduced the ratio from 5 to 1.25. The central differencing scheme seems to yield accurate results when the ratio is low.

Properties of discretisation schemes

  • Conservativeness
  • Boundedness
  • Transportiveness

Conservativeness

To ensure conservation of for the whole solution domain the flux of leaving a control volume across a certain face must be equal to the flux of entering the adjacent control volume through the same face.



Since , and , flux consistency ensures conservation of over the entire domain for the central difference formulation of the diffusion flux.

Boundedness

Scarborough (1958) has shown that a sufficient condition for a convergent iterative method can be expressed in terms of the values of the coefficients of the discretised equations:

If the differencing scheme produces coefficients that satisfy the above criterion the resulting matrix of coefficients is diagonally dominant.

  • This states that in the absence of sources the internal nodal values of property should be bounded by its boundary values.
  • Another essential requirement for boundedness is that all coefficients of the discretised equations should have the same sign (usually all positive).

Transportiveness

We define the non-dimensional cell Peclet number as a measure of the relative strengths of convection and diffusion:

  • no convection and pure diffusion ()

  • no diffusion and pure convection ()
  • in between

It is very important that the relationship between the directionality of influencing and the flow direction and magnitude of the Peclet number, known as the transportiveness, is borne out in the discretisation scheme.

Assessment of the central differencing scheme for convection-diffusion problems

Conservativeness: Satisfied

Boundedness: with , must be satisfied.

Transportiveness: The central differencing scheme introduces influencing at node P from the directions of all its neighbours to calculate the convective and diffusive flux. Thus the scheme does not recognise the direction of the flow or the strength of convection relative to diffusion. It does not possess the transportiveness property at high .

The upwind differencing scheme

One of the major inadequacies of the central differencing scheme is its inability to identify flow direction.

The value of property at a west cell face is always influenced by both and in central differencing.

Example 2

Solve the problem considered in Example 1 using the upwind differencing scheme for (i) m/s, (ii) m/s with the coarse five-point grid.

Node
1 0
2, 3, 4 0 0
5 0

Case 1

Case 2

Assessment of the upwind differencing scheme

The upwind differencing scheme causes the distributions of the transported properties to become smeared. The resulting error has a diffusion-like appearance and is referred to as false diffusion.

Trials have shown that, in high Reynolds number, flows, false diffusion can be large enough to give physically incorrect results.

The hybrid differencing scheme

The central differencing scheme, which is second-order accurate, is employed for small Peclet numbers () and the upwind scheme, which is first-order accurate but accounts for transportiveness, is employed for large Peclet numbers ().

For example, for a west face,

The hybrid differencing formula for the net flux per unit area through the west face is as follows:

The general form of the discretised equation is . The central coefficient .

After some rearrangement it is easy to verify that the neighbour coefficients for the hybrid differencing scheme for steady one-dimensional convection–diffusion can be written as follows:

Hybrid differencing scheme for multi-dimensional convection-diffusion

The discretised equation that covers all cases is given by

with central coefficient

One-dimensional Two-dimensional Three-dimensional
0
0
0 0
0 0

In the above expressions the values of and are calculated with the following formulae:

Face w e s n b t

The power-law scheme

In this scheme diffusion is set to zero when cell exceeds 10. If the flux is evaluated by using a polynomial expression.
For example, the net flux per unit area at the west control volume face is evaluated using

where , and

for .

For